SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(AP) 80

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
VEERAMREDDY VASANTHARAYUDU – Appellant
Versus
VINTHI SATHIRAJU – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THE Civil revision petition has arisen out of a declaration filed by the petitioner herein under section 8 of the Andhra Pradesh Land Reforms (Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings) Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The first respondent herein, who is a third party, came forward with an objection petition on 22-9-1975 before the Land Reforms Tribunal making some allegations against the petitioner that he made some mala fide alienations and suppressed certain facts with regard to his lands. He also sent another objection to the Office of the Land Reforms Tribunal on 26 9-1975. Admittedly he has no interest in the lands declared by the petitioner. Under the circumstances, the question for consideration is whether the first respondent can figure as an objector before the Land Reforms Tribunal and make allegations against the petitioner when he is not concerned with any of the lands shown by the petitioner in his declaration. C. R. P. NO. 5528 of 1978. Dt. 28-2-1979.

( 2 ) ON an interpretation made on the language used in Form IV public notice to be issued as provided under Rule 4 (2) of ihe Rules framed under the Act, the Appellate Tribunal cam






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top