SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 122

C.KONDAIAH
M. Balagangadhara Sastry – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


C. KONDAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS application by a Government servant, under Art. 226 of the Constitution is to quash the proceedings of the Tribunal for disciplinary proceedings, Hyderabad directing joint enquiry into the charges of misconduct levelled against him and another. The material facts leading to this writ petition may briefly be stated Charges have been framed against the petitioner by the tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings Hyderabad in T. E. C. No. 3/ 68 pending before it for misconduct for violating the departmental rules when he was working as Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, guntur. The third respondent herein, who was working as an Asst. Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Guntur at that time, is also charged in t. E. C. No. 4/68 before the same tribunal (or misconduct, and Sri c. P. Brahman, who was working as the Divisional Accountant in the office of the Executive Engineer, Zilla Parishad, Guntur was also proceeded against by the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings for charges of misconduct and the enquiry relating to him is already over. But the enquiries relating to the petitioner and the 3rd res. pondent are pending before the Tribunal. Charges Nos. 4, 5 and 6 in t. E.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top