PARTHASARATHI
V. Seetha Rama Raju – Appellant
Versus
K. Venkata Narsamma – Respondent
( 1 ) THE short point in this revision petition is, whether the order of the lower Court, by which the issues were recast is materially irregular. In order to perspective, the essential facts have to be stated.
( 2 ) O. S. No. 332 of 1966 on the file of the 1st Additional District Munsif, Kovvur was laid by the respondent on foot of her title; and the main relief sought is recovery of possession of a vacant site, which is part of R. S. No108 situate at the village of Kannapuram in West Godavari District. The plaintiff claims to be owner of an extent of Ac. 2-54 cents comprised in the filed bearing the above mentioned survey number. She was granting portions of the land to poor persons at their quest. The grants were being evidenced by the letters which the plaintiff was obtaining from the grantees. It is pleaded by her that at about 15 years ago, the defendant asked for permission to occupy portion of the land, of the extent of 6 cents. The defendant was accordingly allowed to occupy the site as a licensee. Some time later, the defendant craved for leave and lince to occupy a further extent of 15 cents, and this too was granted that the defendant put up a titled ho
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.