KODANDA RAMAYYA
R. Rukmaji Rao – Appellant
Versus
Government Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS revision petition gives rise to an important question relating to court-fees whether court-fees is payable on the memorandum of compromise in a suit for declaration of title and of recovery of possession of immovable property, where under the defendants is entitled for payment of certain sums of money from the plaintiff.
( 2 ) THE material fats may briefly be s sated; In art performance of an agreement of sale dated 18/06/1959 executed by the second respondent in respect of Amar Talkies, Hyderabad ownered by him for a sum of Rs. 1,75,000. 00 the petitioner and the third respondent the vendees were put in possession of the talkies. The vendor had received various sums of money towards sale consideration from the petitioner. In the year 1954 the third respondent had relinquished his interest in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner was therefore in sole and exclusive possession and enjoyment of Amar Talkies. Hyderabad till disputes arose between the parties in the year 1958 regarding the possession of the talkies. No registered sale deed was executed by the vendor. Disputes relating to possession of talkies arose between the vendor and vendees. The possessio
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.