SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 183

P.RAMACHANDRA RAJU
K. Nagappa – Appellant
Versus
T. D. Krishansa – Respondent


P. RAMACHANDRA RAJU, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition arises out of proceedings taken by the two respondents herein under the Andhra Pradesh Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction Control) Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the Rent Control Act" ). The two respondents are undivided brothers and they constitute a joint Hindu Family and are owners of a house bearing No. 65/66 (corresponding to new Nos. 5-2-434, 435 and 440) situate in Hyderbasti, Secunderabad. The building was let out to the petitioner herein on a monthly rental of Rs. 100. 00 for residential purpose a long time ago for residential purpose a long time ago i. e. , the petitioner has been in occupation of the building as a tenant since the year 1948. The respondents have another building, situate in another locality called Pan Bazaar, of their own and they were using it for the residential purpose of both using it for the residential purpose of both the respondents previously. On the ground that the respondents require the building let out to the petitioner also, for their own occupation they wanted him to vacate the building. When he did not do so the petitioner under Section 10 (3) (a) (i) (b) of the Rent Control Act w














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top