SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 237

GOPALRAO EKBOLE, VENKATESWARA RAO
Raja Velugoti Rangamannar Krishna Yachandra Bahdur – Appellant
Versus
R. D. K. Sita Devi Garu – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme court against our judgment given on 3rd February, 1970 in Spl. Tribunal appeals Nos. 16 and 18 of 1966. Those were appeals filed under section 51 of the estates Abolition Act before the Special tribunal, which consisted of two Judges of the High Court. The petition is resisted by the respondent on the ground that no leave can be granted to appeal to the Supreme Court against a judgment given by such a Special Tribunal.

( 2 ) SRI T. S. Narasinga Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner, relied upon article 133 (1) of the Constitution and contended that since the Special Tribunal consists of Judges of the High Court as nominated by the Chief Justice, it is a judgment of the High Court and therefore Art. 133 (1) of the Constitution applies. It is difficult to accept this contention. Article 133 (1) of the Constitution says that an appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any Judgment, decree or final order in a civil proceeding of a High Court in the territory of India. The question therefore, is whether the judgment which we gave was a judgment given in a civil proceeding of a high Court. It may








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top