SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 229

S.OBUL REDDY
E. Ramadoss – Appellant
Versus
Regional Transport Officer, Nellore – Respondent


S. OBUL REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE two petitions can be conveniently disposed of by a common order, as they are filed by the same petitioner seeking the same relief.

( 2 ) THE petitioner is a Motor transport operator, having his office at Madras. His two vehicles , MDH 3510 and MDH 3706, for which he obtained inter-state stage carriage permits are registered in the State of Madras. The period for which the permits were granted expired on 9-2-1968 and he made applications, within the time prescribed, before the Regional Transport Authority, Chingleput, for renewal of the permits. As his applications for renewal of permanent permit were pending consideration, he was directed by the Regional Transport Authority, Chingleput, to apply for temporary permits which he did, and temporary permits were issued for a period of four months valid upto 8-9-1969. These temporary permits were produced before the Regional Transport Officer, Nellore, for his counter Signature on 111-5-1969, and he refused to counter-sign, unless tax is paid to this state also. The petitioner was also informed, by a memo dated 17-5-1969 that the exemption granted under the inter-State agreement will not apply to temporary pe






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top