SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 260

D.V.REDDY, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
Venkanna – Appellant
Versus
Pichikuntal Buchamma – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition arises out of proceedings taken under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural lands Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ), The petitioners herein are the land-holders. The respondents are the protected tenants. The tenants filed an application under Sub-sec. (1) of Sec. 32 of the Act before the Tahsildar, Mahaboobnagar for possession of an extent of Ac 4. 00 cents of land in S. No. 65 situated in the village of Pedda Darapalli, Mahaboobnagar District, alleging that they are the protected tenants for the land covered by S. No, 65 measuring ac. 13-22 guntas and they were cultivating the land for about 4 to 5 years as protected tenants and were in possession of the same, that while so they were forcibly dispossessed of Ac, 4,00 of land out of the total extent of Act13-22 guntas and their possession of the same should be restored. The application was filed against three respondents (Land-holders) of whom the first respondent is the father and respondents 2 and 3 his sons. The two points which are now argued before me and raised by the respondents before the Tahsildar are that it is only respondents 2 and 3, namely, the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top