SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(AP) 255

N.KUMARAYYA, A.SAMBASIVA RAO, GOPALRAO EKBOLE
State Of A. P. , represented by the State Represeptative before the State, Hyderabad, A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Murali Cafe, Main Road, Vijayanagaram – Respondent


KEDDI, J.

( 1 ) (JUDGMENT of the Court was delivered by Obul ) this revision preferred by the State against the order of the sales Tax Appellate Tribunal In T. A, No. 376 of 1966, raises an important question whether the amendment to the proviso to Section 5 (1) of the Aadhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, Introduced by section 5 of the Amendment Act No. 16 of 1963 with effect from 1-8-63 empowers the assessing authority to levy tax at one rate upto the period 31-7-63 in accordance with the proviso as it stood prior to its amendment and In respect of the period subsequent to 31-7-63 at a different rate as provided for in the substituted proviso.

( 2 ) TO appreciate the question involved, we may set out the relevant facts of this case in brief. M/s. Murali Cafe, Vizianagaram (hereinafter referred to as the assessee) was assessed to tax by the deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Vizianagaram, for the year 1963-64 on 30-6-1964 on a net turnover of Rs. 2,77. 618. 21 p. out of which the turnover of meals and coffee worked oat to Rs. 2,73,996. 96 p. The Deputy Commercial) Tax Officer assessed the turnover of meals and coffee splitting it up into two parts (1) Rs. 93,113. 23 p. upto 31-7-63 at






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top