A.SEETHARAM REDDY, K.RAMASWAMY
Tahsildar, Land Acquisition, Visakhapatnam – Appellant
Versus
P. Narasing Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appeal and the Cross-objections reflect the dissatisfaction by the Requisitioning Authority as well as the claimants in determining the compensation in respect of the lands situated in Block No. 4 of Waltair Ward in Visakhapatnam Municipality. , By notification issued under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act (1 of 1894 ). (for short, "the Act",) dated June 23, 1966, an extent of Ac. 5. 37897 sq. "feet in T S No 44 was acquired for planned development of Visakhapatnam municipality. By award dated November 23, 1968, the appellant determined compensation at Rs. 2. 22ps. per sq. yard. He deducted 1/3rd therefrom towards developmental expenses. Rs. 1. 48 Ps. per sq. yard was ultimately awarded, though the claimants laid claim at Rs. 16/- per sq. yard. Dissatisfied there with, the claimants sought for a reference under Section 18 of the Act to the Civil Court. The respondents adduced oral and documentary evidence. Exs. A-1 to A-6 are the sale-deeds. P. Ws. 1 to 3 were examined. The Land acquisition Officer was examined himself as R. W. 1 but adduced no documentary evidence. The lower court rejected the oral and documentary evidence adduced by the respo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.