SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(AP) 55

A.D.V.REDDY
Sagi Surayamma – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


A. D. V. REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by one of the claimants in O P. No. 63/60 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kakinada, against the order denying her claim with regard to the compensation granted in the land Acquisition Proceedings.

( 2 ) AC. 5-76 cents of land situated in the village of Injaram in kakinada Taluk was notified and acquired by the Government for the purposes of providing house sites for Harijans of Merakamalapalli village. Out of this, Ac. 0-94 cents at the time of acquisition be. longed to one Surayyamma the second claimant. With regard to the compensation deposited, as her husband s brother Suryanarayana raju contested her claim, a reference was made to the Land Acquisition Court-cum-Subordinate Judge, K. kinada under Section 31 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act. With regard to the facts of the case, thtre is no dispute. This land acquired, formed part of the lands allotted to her by the court under a compromise decree. She had filed the suit o. S 110/53 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, K. kinada for partition of the plaint schedule lands into seven equal shares and allotting one share to her, contending that the defendants, six in number, and her la







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top