A.D.V.REDDY
Sagi Surayamma – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by one of the claimants in O P. No. 63/60 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Kakinada, against the order denying her claim with regard to the compensation granted in the land Acquisition Proceedings.
( 2 ) AC. 5-76 cents of land situated in the village of Injaram in kakinada Taluk was notified and acquired by the Government for the purposes of providing house sites for Harijans of Merakamalapalli village. Out of this, Ac. 0-94 cents at the time of acquisition be. longed to one Surayyamma the second claimant. With regard to the compensation deposited, as her husband s brother Suryanarayana raju contested her claim, a reference was made to the Land Acquisition Court-cum-Subordinate Judge, K. kinada under Section 31 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act. With regard to the facts of the case, thtre is no dispute. This land acquired, formed part of the lands allotted to her by the court under a compromise decree. She had filed the suit o. S 110/53 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, K. kinada for partition of the plaint schedule lands into seven equal shares and allotting one share to her, contending that the defendants, six in number, and her la
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.