( 1 ) THIS writ petition raises some important questions under the hyderabad Record of Rights in Land Regulations, 1358 Fasli and the applicability of the doctrine of resjudicata to proceedings under section 15 (2) of the Regulations I think it desirable that the matter may be decided authoritatively by a Bench. I, therefore, direct tbat the writ petition may be posted before a Bench. In pursuance of the above order this case came on for final hearing before the Bench consisting of the Hon ble Mr, N. Kumarayya, acting Chief Justice and the Hon ble Mr. Justice Kondaiah. Mr Jaleel Ahmed Advocate for the petitioner. Mr N. Narasimha Iyengar Advocate for the 1st respondent, 3rd Government Pleader on behalf of the 2nd respondent.

( 2 ) THIS is a petition for issue of a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing the order of the additional Collector, Medak, dated 17-4-1965, whereby he, in exercise of his powers under S. 15 (2) of the Hyderabad Record of cases, bis only claim is that he is in actual possession, of the office; "de facto" means "by the title of possession" in antithesis to "de juri" i. e. by the title of right, 1949 (2) M. L. J, 171 follow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document