SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(AP) 118

A.D.V.REDDY
G. Bhoom Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Madamma – Respondent


A. D. V. REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to revise the order of the Subordinate Judge, nizamabad directing the plaintiff to pay additional Court fee. The suit was for partition and possession of the plaintiff s share in the joint family properties, after setting aside certain alienations made in favour of defendants 4 to 9. The plaintiff had valued the suit under Section XXXIV (2) of the Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act and paid a fixed court fee Rs. 200/ -. The court fee Examiner on examining the adequacy of the Court fees paid, issued a check slip stating that the plaintiff has to value the properties sold to defendants 4 to 9 separately and pay court fee thereon as required under Sections 29, 34 (2) 11 and 17 read with section (3) of the Court fees Act. The court on examining the contentions upheld the check slip and directed the plaintiff to pay additional court fee required* Hence this petition to revise that order.

( 2 ) IN the plaint it is alleged that the plaint schedule properties also form part of the joint family properties and after the death of the plaintiff s father, defendants 1 to 3 who are the step-mother, mother, step-sister of the plaintiff, ha




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top