SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(AP) 3

A.D.V.REDDY, NARASIMHAM
R. D. K. SITA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
C. ANNA RAO – Respondent


A. D. V. REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE are appeals by the petitioner in I. A. Nos. 157 to 15s) of 1960 in O. P. No. 2452 of 1953 on the file of the Estates Abolition Tribunal, Nellore. Pamur group and other Estates in Nellore and Chittoor districts had been taken over by the Government and compensation amounts were deposited before the Estates Abolition Tribunal. After the deposit of the compensation, there were several claims made against the Estate by charge decree-holders as well as others and the Tribunal held that the charge decree holders who are!2 in number were entitled to prioity and again divided the 12 charge decree-holders into seven categories as per priority among them. The petitioner, who is common in these petitions, is one Srimathi Sita Devi, wife of Sri R. D. K. Venkata mahipal Bahadur varu. She had obtained a charge decree in O. S. No. 56 of 1927 on the file of Sub Court, Chittoor towards her maintenance, on the estate and thereupon she filed, O. P. No 2542 of 1952 claiming the monies due to her from the estate and her claim was recognised by the Tribunal for a sum of Rs. 38,472 and the Tribunal directed that a sum of Rs. 7,553 should be paid immediately out of the amoun



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top