SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(AP) 122

O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
In Re: Devaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


O. CHINNAPPA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Section 561- A Criminal Procedure Code is entirely misconceived. In this application the petitioner seeks to have quashed an order of the Commissioner of Police under Section (1) of the Hyderabad City Police act of 1 348 Fasli directing the petitioner to remove himself form the area of Kachiguda and shift himself to the area within the limits of Trimulgherry Police Circle and not leave that are for a period of one year. 2 Section 561-A of the Criminal Procedure Code preserves the inherent power of the High Court to make suitable orders (1) to give effect to any order under the Code (2) to present abuse of the process of the court or (3) to secure the ends of justice, to make appropriate orders to secure the ends of justice does not empower the High Court with any omnipotent power. The order to be made by High Court under Section 561-A to secure the ends of justice must be in relation to a proceedings in the High Court or in any subordinate Criminal Court and that proceedings too must have judicial character and must not be a proceedings of an executive or administrative character. The Commissioner of Police acting under Section 26

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top