SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(AP) 208

MADHAVA REDDY
Pinninty Peda Govindayya – Appellant
Versus
Pinnity Subba Rao – Respondent


KRISHNA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is filed by defendants 1 to 6 and 8. The respondents filed a suit O. S. 32 of 1959 on the file of the Suborinate Judgr, Bapaiia under section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, after having obtained the sanction of the Advocate General, for framing a scheme for the management of a public trust consisting of Ac 19-96 cents of tamarind tope situate in S. No. 36 of Annavaram village in Bapatla taluk, Guntur District. The case of the plaintiffs is that the ancestors of the Pinninty family dedicated the suit land and tope for the benefit of the pubiic, that a title deed No. 397 was granted at the time of the Inam Commission in favour of Pinninti Lakshmipathi as trustee of the charitable tope free of tax, that ever since, the said tope was being enjoyed by the members of the public, that in August 1958, the defendants cut and carried way some of the tamarind trees, that the defendants in breach of the trust, obtained a patta in their own name under the Inams Abolition Act, that the defendants had betn cultivating an extent of about Ac. 5. 00 of the trust property for their own use and that a scheme for the administration of the trust should be framed by
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top