ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Ali – Respondent
( 1 ) THE learned Public Prosecutor has filed this appeal against the judgment of the Second Additional District Munsif Magistrate, Vijayawada, acquitting the sole accused altogether.
( 2 ) THE relevant facts are as follows.
( 3 ) THE Superintendent-in-charge, Central Telegraph Office, Vijayawada, filed a complaint on 13-11-1963, in the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vijayawada, in which he stated as follows:-"complaint filed under Section 195 (1) (a), Criminal Procedure Code for offences under Sections 182, 417 and 471, I. P. C. The Superintendent-in-charge, Central Telegraph Office, Vijayawada, sent a requisition to the Sub-Regional Employment Officer, Vijayawada, on 9-7-1962 requesting him to send candidates for appointment as telegraph peons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SD/- Complainant, Superintendent-in-charge, C. T. O. , Vijayawada. "
( 4 ) THE learned Magistrate, Sri G. Pulliah, took it on file making an endorsement as follows:-"taken on file on 13-11-63 under Section 417 and 471, Indian Penal Code. Issue summons to the accused. . . . . . . . . . . "
( 5 ) THE prosecution examined seven witnesses. Of these, H. A. D. Monte (P. W. 1) w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.