SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(AP) 71

ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Public Prosecutor – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Ali – Respondent


ANATHANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THE learned Public Prosecutor has filed this appeal against the judgment of the Second Additional District Munsif Magistrate, Vijayawada, acquitting the sole accused altogether.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are as follows.

( 3 ) THE Superintendent-in-charge, Central Telegraph Office, Vijayawada, filed a complaint on 13-11-1963, in the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate, Vijayawada, in which he stated as follows:-"complaint filed under Section 195 (1) (a), Criminal Procedure Code for offences under Sections 182, 417 and 471, I. P. C. The Superintendent-in-charge, Central Telegraph Office, Vijayawada, sent a requisition to the Sub-Regional Employment Officer, Vijayawada, on 9-7-1962 requesting him to send candidates for appointment as telegraph peons. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SD/- Complainant, Superintendent-in-charge, C. T. O. , Vijayawada. "

( 4 ) THE learned Magistrate, Sri G. Pulliah, took it on file making an endorsement as follows:-"taken on file on 13-11-63 under Section 417 and 471, Indian Penal Code. Issue summons to the accused. . . . . . . . . . . "

( 5 ) THE prosecution examined seven witnesses. Of these, H. A. D. Monte (P. W. 1) w

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top