SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(AP) 67

GOPALRAO EKBOLE
Sri Baba Commercial Syndicate – Appellant
Versus
Channamasetti Dasu – Respondent


GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against the judgment of the Subordinate Judge, Narsapur, given on 18-7-1964 where by he allowed the appeal and dismissed the plaintiffs suit.

( 2 ) THE necessary facts are that the plaintiffs petitioners before me filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 628-81 np. from the first defendant being the balance of principal and interest due on u promissory note, Ex. A-l, dated 14-10-1959, executed by the first defendant in favour of the plaintiffs for Rs. 900 and another sum of Rs. 314 due as balance of the amount due on Chit No. 7 as per the account maintained in regular course of business by the plaintiffs. The second defendant was the partner of the firm. He was impleaded although it was alleged by the plaintiffs that the second defendant had given up his rights in the firm by virtue of a letter in favour of the second plaintiff. The first plaintiff is the firm, the second plaintiff being the sole surviving partner of the firm said to have been dissolved.

( 3 ) THE first defendant raised number of pleas. I am not, however, concerned with most of them. The only contention with which 1 am concerned is that the defendant r












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top