SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(AP) 64

A.SAMBASIVA RAO, P.JAGMOHAN REDDY
Municipal Council of Vizianagaram – Appellant
Versus
Shah Bibi Saheba – Respondent


SAMBASIVA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THESE four second appeals involve one common question and the parties also are the same in all the four second appeals. These second appeals were referred to a Division Bench by N. D. Krishna Rao, J. , as the correctness of the view taken by Ekbote J. , in S. A. No. 617 of 1962 which was relied on by the learned counsel for the appellant before him and was questioned by the learned counsel for the respondent. The Municipal Council of Vizianagaram, represented by its Commissioner and Executive Authority is the appellant and an assessee in that Municipality is the respondent in all the four second appeals, The second appeals arise out of four suits filed by the appellant in the Court of the District Munsif at Vizianagaram for recovery of certain sums made up of:-- (1) house-tax due for certain half-years; (2) Surcharge on the said house-tax; and (3) Library cess and warrant fees.

( 2 ) IN addition to the other defences the respondent as defendant raised the plea that the demand made by the appellant in so far as it relates to the surcharge and the library cess was illegal as the procedure prescribed under Sections 78 and 80 and Rule 9 of Schedule IV of the Mad















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top