( 1 ) (THE Judgment of the Court was delivered by Chmnappa Reddy; J.) the appellant in this appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed the suit out of which the appeal arises for a mandatory injunction for removal of certain obstructions placed on plots marked 2 (a) and 3 (a) in the plan and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering in any manner with the right oi the plaintiff to use the street A, B, C, D, for the paslag of men, cattle and carts for reaching plot No. 1 belonging to her. The suit was based on the allegations that A,b,c,d, was a public street,that the plots marked 2 (a) and 3 (a) were part of the public street, and that tho dcfendents had encroached upon plots 2 (a) and 3 (a) and caused ce tain obs ructions to be placed therein which interfered with the right of the plaintiff to the free use of the street for the passage of men, cattle and cans. Both the lower Court found the facts substantially as alleged by the plaintiff, namely that A,b,c,d, was a public street, that plots 2 (a) and 3 (a) were part of the public street and that the plaintiff had a right to use the street for the passage of her men, cattle and carts. On those f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document