SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(AP) 191

SHARFUDDIN AHMED, VENKATESWARA RAO
In Re: P. Bapanaiah – Appellant
Versus
States – Respondent


VENKATESWARA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS criminal revision petition, which arises out of a prosecution under Section 135 of the Customs Act and Rule 126-P (2) of the Defence of India Rules, 1962 (Part XII-A Gold Control) has been referred to the Bench by our learned brother, Mohammed Mirza, J. , for decision "in view of the important question of law raised" in the case.

( 2 ) THE factors of the case may briefly be set out here. On receipt of information that Pabbati Bapnaaiah, the petitioner herein, would be leaving Hyderabad for Kothagudem by bus on 3-2-65, with contraband gold, the Deputy Superintendent, Customs and Central Excise, Hyderabad, with some members of his staff, lay in wait at the Gowliguda Bus Dept. in Hyderabad. The petitioner arrived there at 9 A. M. with a holdall in his hand. On a search of his person and belongings, it was found that he concealed in a pillow, four gold slabs with foreign markings "johnson Mathey 999-O London 10 tolas". Those slabs were seized and further investigation revealed that no permit was issued to the petitioner, who is a licenced dealer in gold, to import them from abroad. After necessary enquiry, the Deputy Collector, Central Excise, Guntur, im





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top