SATYANARAYANA RAO, J.

( 1 ) PLAINTIFF is the appellant in this second appeal. He instituted the suit for a declaration that he is entitled to the plaint scheduled properties after the life-time of the 1st defendant and that the alienations made by the 1st defendant are not binding on him after the life-time of the 1st defendant. The 1st defendant made several alienations and the defendants who are interested in those alienations are impleaded as parties to the suit. The 1st defendant is related to the plaintiff as the widow of his deceased brother, one Venkata Subbareddi. Both of them constituted a joint Hindu family and after the death of the other brother, the properties survived to the plaintiff. The 1st defendant instituted the suit O. S. 421 of 1945 claiming maintenance and a charge for the amount on the properties of the joint family. She claimed also a larger relief for partition. But that was denied. The suit was decreed ex parte on 29-6-1946. The ex parte decree was kater set aside and a decree on contest was passed. After that decree, the plaintiff and the 1st defendant entered into a compromise and they filed a compromise petition E. A. 428 of 1969 into Court under O. XXI

Click Here to Read the rest of this document