GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is from the judgment of the Subordinate judge, Warangal given on 5th May, 1962, whereby the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed the plaintiff s suit.

( 2 ) THE essential facts are that the plaintiff s husband had separated from his brothers. He however, died on 23rd June, 1944 Fasli, corresponding to 26th March, 1935, leaving only the plaintiff as his widow. He also left the property mentined in A to E Schedules attached to the plainti. The plaintiff , after the death of her husband, succeeded to the properties and was in possession on the day when the hindu Succession Act, 1956, came into force. It is contended by her that under section 14 of the said Act, she became the absolute owner of the said property. The 1st defendant who is the brother of the plaintiff s husband and the father of the 2nd defendant, did not like the idea of the plaintiff becoming absolute owner because of the said Act. He therefore, with the assistance of the 2nd defendant, started threatening the plaintiff s watchmen and agricultural servants and commenced interfering with the longstanding possession and enjoyment of the plaintiff. The plaintiff therefore instituted t