SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(AP) 215

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : S.OBUL REDDY, VENKATESWARA RAO
Public Prosecutor - Appellant
Versus
Papanna - Respondent
Decided On : 12-26-67

In a circumstantial evidence case, the circumstances must be such as to exclude every hypothesis other than the guilt of the accused.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - SECTION 302, 392, I. P. C. - MURDER - CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE - CONVICTION - SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE - EXPLANATION OF ACCUSED - APPRECIATION OF EVIDENCE BY TRIAL COURT - MISDIRECTION - SETTING ASIDE OF ACQUITTAL - SENTENCE.

Fact of the Case:

The accused was charged with murder and robbery under Sections 302 and 392 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The prosecution alleged that the accused killed his wife in a forest area and then pledged her gold earrings. The accused denied the charges and claimed that he had left his wife alone in the forest after seeing two men in khaki approaching them.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court found that the circumstances established by the prosecution, including the presence of the accused's towel on the deceased's body and the recovery of the knife he had with him, were sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court held that the accused's explanation that he had run away from the scene after seeing two men in khaki was not convincing and that his immediate conduct after the incident, including pledging the deceased's earrings, pointed to his involvement in the crime.

Issues: 1. Whether the circumstances established by the prosecution were sufficient to prove the accused's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. 2. Whether the accused's explanation for his conduct was convincing.

Ratio Decidendi: The High Court held that the circumstances established by the prosecution, including the presence of the accused's towel on the deceased's body and the recovery of the knife he had with him, were sufficient to establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The Court also held that the accused's explanation that he had run away from the scene after seeing two men in khaki was not convincing and that his immediate conduct after the incident, including pledging the deceased's earrings, pointed to his involvement in the crime.

Final Decision: The High Court set aside the accused's acquittal and convicted him of murder under Section 302 of the IPC, sentencing him to life imprisonment. The Court did not impose a separate sentence for the robbery charge under Section 392 of the IPC.

OBUL REDDI, J.

( 1 ) THE State has preferred this appeal against the acquittal of the accused-respondent of the charges framed against him under Section 302, I. P. C. for causing the murder of his wife, and under Section 392, I. P. C. for committing of the crime, murder.

( 2 ) THE case of the prosecution briefly stated is thus: Thus deceased Gowramma was married to the accused about ten months prior to the occurrence. Before here marriage one other person wanted to marry her, but ultimately P. W. 2, who brought her up, gave her in marriage to the accused. The accused was teasing her about the other suitor and this led to frequent quarrels between the husband and wife. According to P. W. 2, she has once, about a month prior to the occurrence, complained to him that her husband was not treating her properly. The brother of accused, P. W. 1 has also stated that his sister-in-law, the deceased, was not treated properly by his brother, the accused, and that there were frequent quarrels between the couple. On 20-12-1964 the accused accompanied by his wife, the deceased, went to the forest area, about a mile from the village to collect firewood. At the time when he left the house, he had taken a knife or cutting sickle and his wife accompanied him. P. W. 3 was the person who saw the deceased and the accused going together. She had also accosted the accused. When accosted by P. W. 3, the accused told her that he and his wife were going to the forest to collect fire-wood, and they did not return that night (Sunday evening) nor anything was known about the accused and the deceased till Friday morning. On the morning of Friday, 24-12-1964. P. W. 4 came and informed P. W. 1 that he saw a dead body in the forest. Then P. W. 1 collected some persons and went to the forest area and there discovered the corpse of his deceased sister-in-law covered with an upon cloth (M. O. 2) belonging to his brother (accused and also a knife (M. O. 1) which the accused had carried with him while going to the forest. He then went to the Village Munsif (P. W. 6) and gave a report Ex. P. 1 stating that the corpse of his sister-in-law was discovered in the forest area. The village Munsif sent report. Ex. P. 1 along with his printed reports to the Magistrate and the Sub-Inspector of Police. P. W. 15, the Sub-Inspector of Police, registered a case on the strength of Ex. P1 and issued express F. I. Rs. to all the concerned superiors and proceeded to the scene of occurrence reaching there by 4 a. m. on 28-12-64. At the time of the inquest, he seized the bill-hook (M. O. 1), towel or upper cloth covered on the body of the deceased (M. O. 2) and jewellery on the person of the deceased.

( 3 ) P. W. 12, the Civil Assistant Surgeon of Kuppam was sent for to the scene of occurrence and he arrived at the scene of occurrence at about 1. 30 P. M. on 29-12-1964. He commenced autopsy on the highly decomposed body of the deceased at 2. 30 P. M. and found the following external injuries: 1. Pink coloured contusion 4" X 3" irregular shaped on the lower aspect of the left chest inside of whose wall is contused red bloody, spleen lacerated on the outer aspect and lies in clotted blood. 2. Left shoulder and left upper part of the chest red and contused irregularly. 3. An area 4" X 3" contused depressed wall at the lower aspect of right clavicle with 2 and 3 right ribs fractured bloody and it is clotted. 4. Right side of the scalp is red and congested compared to the left side of scalp. Right shoulder red and congested. Area from right ear to right shoulder and joints lacerated and macerated of all sort tissues almost exposing skeleton in that area. In his opinion, the deceased died due to shock and hemorrhage as a result of the injuries. According to him, injury 4 could have been caused by a sharp-edged instrument like M. O. 1 and the other injuries by any blunt object like a stone or with the handle of a sickle. Therefore, there is no doubt from the injuries found by the Medical Of











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top