SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(AP) 207

MOHD.MIRZA
K. Janardhan Reddy – Appellant
Versus
VIth City Magistrate Criminal Court, Hyderabad – Respondent


MOHAMED MIRZA, J.

( 1 ) CRIMINAL Revision Petition no. 337 of 1967 is directed against an order of the learned 6th City Magistrate, Hyderabad indicating proceedings under S. 145, Cr. P. C. in M. C. 8 of 1967 on his file.

( 2 ) IT appears that a petition was filed by one K. Narasimha Reddy and K. Krishna Reddy against K. Janardhan Reddy and K. Pulla Reddy, alleging that the parties were members of a joint Hindu family. No partition of joint family property had taken place till the time this petition was filed, and it was also stated that K. Janardhan Reddy and K. Pulla Reddy, and other members of the family were living in the house from the time the construction was started. Some other facts were also mentioned, but I am not concerned with those facts, because they are not necessary for a decision of this case. But, it was mentioned before the Magistrates Court that K. Janardhan Reddy and K. Pulla Reddy, in collusion with one Sitarama Raju. who is a tenant, had planned to dispossess the petitioners from the house, a portion of which was in his possession, and it was requested that in view of the likelihood under Section 145 Cr. P. C. may be started.

( 3 ) IT appears that the learned







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top