SHARFUDDIN AHMED
RAJAB ALI PIRANI, PARTNER M. PIRANI and COMPANY, SECUNDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HYDERABAD – Respondent
( 1 ) THE appellant instituted a suit against the Government of Andhra Pradesh, through the Chief Secretary (O. S. 88/1/56) before the III Additional Judge, city Civil Court, Secunderabad for the recovery of certain amounts from the sales tax Department. It was stated that the plaintiff was a registered partnership firm carrying on business in the manufacture and sale of agricultural implements. For the 1950-51, the Sales Tax Officer (C) Circle, Secunderabad had wrongfully levied a tax of Rs. 2344/-and for the subsequent year a sum of Rs. 5208/ -. "the assessments were exparte and though the appellant preferred an appeal before the Appellate Commissioner, it was dismissed without going into the merits of the case. A revision was filed and even there the appellant was unsuccesa- ful. Later, he filed a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution ; but the High court without going into the merits of the case, dismissed the writ petition mainly on the ground that tha plaintiff-appellant bad an alterna- tive remedy by way of a regular suit. Later on, application for leave to appeal to Supreme Court was dismissed and a Special Leave Petition filed before tbt sup
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.