( 1 ) THIS is a petition to revise the order dated 22-6-1960 of the 1st Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereby he refused to include in the decree, the Court fee amount and also the Advocates fee as costs of the suit, payable by the judgment-debtor to the decree-holder. The plaintiff had brought her suit in forma pauperis. She could not pay the Advocates fee which she had agreed to pay as she was possessed of no means. The advocate filed his certificate stating that the stipulated fee which was an amount certain, was not paid on account of pauperism. It was requested that the might be included in the decree as a taxable amount. A decree according was drawn with the said amount included therein. The court fee was also included in the decree. Thereafter the judgment-debtor by an application took objection to the inclusion of both the items. The objection with regard to the court fee was to the effect that the court fee was directed to be recovered by the Government from the plaintiff. The court-fee thus being payable by the plaintiff it was said that it cannot be taxed as costs of the suit. Then the objection with regard to the Advocates fee was on the g