SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 136

A.V.KRISHNA RAO, P.JAGMOHAN REDDY
Akkipeddi Gopalasastry – Appellant
Versus
Vijayawada Engineering Metal Co. Ltd. – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE two letters Patent Appeals arise out of two connected suits O. S. 10 of 1959 and O. S. 16 of 1959 on the file of the Addl. District Judge, Krishna. The defendant who is the same in both the suits is the appellant in the above appeals which arise under the following circumstances: The plaintiff who is the same in both the suits is the liquidator of a company called the Vijayawada Engineering Metal Co. , Ltd. The said Company was started in 1947 and its workshop (foundry) was worked till the year 1959 when it was closed due to mismanagement. The Company fell into debts and was accordingly wound up voluntarily. As a result thereof the plaintiff was appointed as a liquidator to wind up the said Company by disposing of the machinery, etc. As the machinery was not in working order, the plaintiff wanted to put the same in working order before he could sell the same. Accordingly, the plaintiff, entrusted the same to the defendant who was related to him and requested him to put the workshop and machinery in working order so that it may be easily sold out to third parties. Thereupon an agreement, Ex-A-1 dated 14-3-1953 was executed between the plaintiff and the defendant, the mat












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top