SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 150

A.GOPAL RAO
Manora Bai – Appellant
Versus
Sultan Bakath Begum – Respondent


A. GOPAL RAO, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is directed against an order of the IVth Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad given on 29-12-1962.

( 2 ) THE essential facts are that five decree-holders obtained money decrees against one Sultan Bakath Begum from the City Civil Courts. The petitioner obtained a decree for Rs. 15,575-20 np. The 1st respondent Ama Ravamma obtained a decree for Rs. 27,435-20 np. We are not concerned with regard to the decree amounts of the other decree-holders. It is however necessary to mention that one Keshagiri Rao, who had obtained and decree for Rs. 6,000 against the same judgment-debtor, from the 1st Additional Judge, City Civil Court and in whose favour the order of rateable distribution is made, is not made a party to this revision petition. The four decree-holders except the 1st respondent applied in their execution petitions for the attachment of a certain amount held by the receiver appointed by the High Court in C. S. No. 13 of 1958. The Judgment-debtor was one of the defendants in the said suit. The amount thus attached was sent to the attaching Court in the form of a cheque for Rs. 16,407 on 24-7-1962. The cheque was cashed on 31-7-1








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top