SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 179

P.JAGMOHAN REDDY, ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Conservator of Forests Nizamabad Circle, Nizamabad – Appellant
Versus
K. Sridhara Reddy – Respondent


ANANTANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) SRIDHARA Reddy filed Writ petition No. 106 praying for the issue of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or such other appropriate writ, direction or order as may be deemed necessary to restrain respondents 1 and 2 from imposing and demanding a sum of Rs. 23,088 towards Government loss or fine and to restrain them from collecting the said sum as arrears of land revenue. This sum included a sum of Rs. 11,250 by way of penalty. There were three respondents in the said Writ Petition viz. . the Conservator of Forests. Divisional Forest Officer and Tahsildar.

( 2 ) SRIDHARA Reddy filed another Writ Petition No. 107 of 1962 against the same respondents for similar relief regarding another sum of Rs. 27,949 which included a penalty of Rs. 14,500.

( 3 ) THE respondents represented by the learned IIIrd Government Pleader, contested the two Writ Petitions after filing counter in each of them.

( 4 ) OUR learned brother. Gopal Rao, Ekbote J heard both the Writ Petitions together by common consent and passed a common judgment allowing both the Writ Petitions only to the extent of reducing the compensation (penalty) in each case to a sum of Rs. 100.

( 5 ) THE responden































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top