SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 229

ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Chimakurihi Seethaiah – Appellant
Versus
Burra Venkata Reddi – Respondent


ANATHANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition to revise the order of the learned District Munsif, Bapatla dated 28-1-1961 in O S No 334 of 1957.

( 2 ) THE sole plaintiff. Chimakurthi Seataiah, filed O. S. No. 334 of 1957 in the Court of the District Munsif, Bapatla against Burra Venkata Reddi as sole defendant for dissolution of partnership if found necessary for settlement of accounts regarding a certain transaction and for payment of such amount as may be found due. The learned District Munsif, after full trial, passed a preliminary decree by judgment dated 8-9-1960 for accounts being rendered by the plaintiff. The plaintiff felt aggrieved and filed A. S. No. 83 of 1960 in the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge. Bapatla against the preliminary decree. The subordinate Judge dismissed that appeal by his Judgment dated 21-7-1961. A few months after the learned Subordinate Judge dismissed A. S. No. 83 of 1960, the learned District Munsif passed an order dated 26-10-1961 as follows. "the advocate for the plaintiff is absent and his clerk could not explain the default. From what is stated it appears they are not anxious for it. Dismissed for default No costs "the plaintiff filed





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top