SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 223

KUMARAYYA
Seelu Subbaramayya – Appellant
Versus
Kotamreddi Kotareddi – Respondent


( 1 ) PLAINTIFFS are the appellants. Their suit as the nearest reversioners of Ramanujam, the last male-holder, questioning the alienations made by ghinnamma, the mother of Ramanujam and the life estateholder, in favour of defendants 1 to 11 has been decreed as against defendant No. 10 and dismissed as against all others. The dismissal as against defendants 1 to 6, 9 and 11 was in consequence of settlement out of Court and as against defendants 7 and 8 who are the alienees from the purchaser of ac. 0. 64 cents of land in revenue sale for arrears of renvenue Was on merits. The present appeal is confined to their claim in relation to these ac. 0. 64 cents in possession of defendants 7 and 8 in equal halves under sale deeds Exhibit B-1 and B-3.

( 2 ) THE facts are few. The original holder of these lands was one Varadayya, a harijan of Aluganipadu in Kowur taluk. He had two wives Obamma and ghinnamma one daughter by name Guravamma by his first wife and two sons ramalingam and Ramanujam by his second wife at the time he died. The two sons got into possession of the property by right of survivorship. They did not however live long. They died unmarried one after the other. Ramanujam was,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top