SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 219

GOPALRAO EKBOLE
Somireddy Veeraiah – Appellant
Versus
Nagabandi Ranganaikulu – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS second appeal arises out of Suit O. S. No. 101/4 of 1957 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Warangal. The necessary facts are: Nagabandi Ranganaikulu, the plaintiff, instituted the suit firstly for possession of the land. The plaint however was subsequently amended including the relief of redemption of usufructuary mortgage. It was alleged inter alia that defendants 1 to 3 and Ali Mirza, father of defendants 1 and 2, mortgaged the suit land with the plaintiff for a sum of Rs. 15,000 on first Thir, 1358-F. A registered usufructuary mortgage deed was executed on that date. The same land were previously mortgaged for Rs. 2,000 with defendants 4 and 5 by Mohammed mirza, one of the mortgagors (1st defendant), on 19th Shehrewar, 1356-F. It was contended by the plaintiff that in view of the terms of the usufructuary mortgage the debt of defendants 4 and 5 has been completely liquidated. The plaintiff therefore asked the defendants 4 and 5 to deliver possession of the suit lands to the plaintiff. There were proceedings under section 145, Criminal Procedure Code in which possession of defendants 4 and 5 was declared. Since defendants 4 and 5 refused to deliver possessi












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top