SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 232

OBUL REDDI
R. Sarojini – Appellant
Versus
B. Lakshmana Rao – Respondent


( 1 ) THIS writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of india challenging the order of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur, dated 27th November, 1963 in M. P. No. 76 of 1963 allowing the claim of the first respondent (workman) for back wages for the period from 1st June, 1961 to 30th September, 1963. The petitioner is the proprietor, Ramakrishna Bus Service and the first respondent was a conductor in the transport service of the petitioner. The first respondent was dismissed on 27th October, 1959, and an industrial dispute was raised, and the matter was referred to the Labour Court, Guntur and the Labour Court passed an award on 5th August, 1961, reinstating the worker on the ground that the management of the petitioner s bus service did not permit the worker to join service or discharge his duties as a conductor. Pursuant to the award of the Labour Court,, the first respondent filed an application under section 33-C (2) of the Andhra Pradesh industrial Disputes Act read with rule 64 (2) of the rules made thereunder claiming back wages. The Labour Court granted a certificate to the effect that the worker was entitled to a sum of Rs. 1,274. Subsequent to t



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top