SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(AP) 280

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : GOPALRAO EKBOLE, SHARFUDDIN AHMED
Boya Marenna - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 12-27-66

In order to convict an accused of murder under section 302, IPC, the prosecution must prove that the accused had the intention to kill the deceased.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL APPEAL - MURDER - CONVICTION - EVIDENCE - EYE WITNESSES - DYING DECLARATION - MEDICAL EVIDENCE - MOTIVE - SECTION 302, 302 READ WITH 34, 323, INDIAN PENAL CODE - HELD, CONVICTION OF A-1 UNDER SECTION 302 IPC UPHELD, CONVICTION OF A-2 UNDER SECTION 302 READ WITH 34 IPC SET ASIDE, INSTEAD CONVICTED UNDER SECTION 323 IPC.

Fact of the Case:

The deceased was stabbed by A-1 and beaten by A-2 in a coffee hotel. The deceased ran away and fell into a paddy field. He was taken to the village chavadi where he gave a dying declaration. He died in the hospital the next day. The accused were convicted of murder under sections 302 and 302 read with 34, IPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the evidence of the eye witnesses was not reliable. The court also found that the dying declaration was genuine and that the deceased had died because of the injury to the heart. The court held that A-1 was guilty of murder under section 302, IPC, but that A-2 was guilty only of causing hurt under section 323, IPC.

Issues: 1. Whether the evidence of the eye witnesses was reliable. 2. Whether the dying declaration was genuine. 3. Whether the deceased died because of the injury to the heart. 4. Whether A-1 was guilty of murder under section 302, IPC. 5. Whether A-2 was guilty of murder under section 302 read with 34, IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court found that the evidence of the eye witnesses was not reliable because they were tutored and gave contradictory statements. 2. The court found that the dying declaration was genuine because it was recorded by a village official in the presence of witnesses and the deceased was conscious at the time. 3. The court found that the deceased died because of the injury to the heart because the medical evidence showed that the injury was fatal. 4. The court held that A-1 was guilty of murder under section 302, IPC, because he had stabbed the deceased with a knife with the intention of killing him. 5. The court held that A-2 was guilty only of causing hurt under section 323, IPC, because he had only beaten the deceased with a stick and there was no evidence that he had intended to kill him.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal in so far as A-2 was concerned and modified the sentence to rigorous imprisonment for six months. The court rejected the appeal in so far as A-1 was concerned.

GOPAL RAO EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the accused who have been convicted under sections 302 and 302 read with sections 34, Indian Penal Code and have been awarded imprisonment for life against the judgment of the Additional Sessions judge, Kurnool given on 21st May, 1964. The necessary facts are that A-2 is the paternal uncle of A-1. Both of them are residents of Narnur Village, 8 miles away from Kurnool town. A-1 s sister and the deceased s sister were married to brothers in Kottala Village. The deceased budanna also belongs to Narnur Village. On 8th December, 1963, it is alleged that the deceased went to the house of A-1 and finding his wife alone in the house tried to molest her. Later in the evening the same day, when A-1 and his uncle, a-2, came home from the fields, they were informed about it. The accused upon wanted to kill the deceased and began to search for him. At about 8 P. M. , when the deceased was in the Coffee Hotel of Gokari Sab (P. W. 1) at the outskirts of the village, Narnur, along with some others to take tea, A-1 armed with a dagger and A-2 with a stick entered the Hotel abusing the deceased for having tried to molest A-1 s wife. A-2 beat the deceased on his head with the stick as well as on his right hand. A-1 stabbed him on his left chest. The deceased holding his stab injury with his palm ran towards the bridge. The accused chased him. The accused, however, did not pursue their chase and returned. The deceased went about 200 yards from the Hotel and sat on the bridge. He, however, fell down from the bridge and was lying in a slushy field. P. W. 6, who is the sister of the deceased, coming to know about the incident and the fact that the deceased was lying in the paddy field near the bridge went there along with her another brother (P. W. 5) and some others. They found the deceased lying in the paddy field of Gurumurthy below the bridge. They brought him to the road where the deceased told P. W. 5, P. W. 6 and others that when he was sitting in P. W. 1 s Hotel, A-1 and A-2 came there, beat and stabbed him and that he ran to that bridge and when he was sitting on it he became dazed and fell into the field. The deceased was then removed to the village chavadi.

( 2 ) THE Village Munsif came there. He recorded the statement of the deceased and obtained his thumb impression upon the said statement. The deceased thereafter was taken to the Government Hospital by P. W. 5. and others. He was admitted in the Hospital by P. W. 9. He was then admitted into Surgical Ward No. 1. P. W. 11, who is another Doctor, carried on some operation. The deceased, however, died at 10-25 A. M. on gth December, 1963. An inquest was held the same day by P. W. 17 between 12-45 P. M. and 2 P. M. Exhibit P-23 is the inquest report. P. W. 21, the Sub-Inspector received the report at 12-30 A. M. on 9th December, 1963. He thereupon started to the scene of occurrence. He reached there at 4 A. M. He examined P. Ws. 1,3, 5 and others and thereafter went to Kuruool. He changed the F. I. R. which was earlier issued under section 325 to section 302, indian Penal Code. The Circle Inspector (P. W. 22) verified the investigation. P. W. 12 conducted the autopsy on 9th December, 1963. Exhibit P-12 is the post-mortem certificate. Since the accused were absconding, charge-sheet was filed after the conclusion of the investigation on 3rd January, 1964. The accused surrendered before the court on nth January, 1964. The accused denied the offence and pleaded not guilty. The prosecution examined in all 22 witnesses and produced several documents. Upon this material, the learned Sessions Judge found both the accused guilty as stated supra, under sections 302 and 302 read with section 34, Indian Penal code and both the accused were sentenced each to undergo imprisonment for life.

( 3 ) THE entire case depends upon the eye witnesses who are P. Ws. 1 to 4, the dying declaration recorded by P. W. 13 (Exhibit P-13), and the oral dying declaration al


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top