SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 20

CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRI
Kolli Eranna – Appellant
Versus
Bellamkonda Thimmaiah – Respondent


CHANDRASEKHARA SASTRY, J.

( 1 ) THE question raised in these revision petitions relates to the amount of Stamp duty payable on an award. The plaintiffs sought to obtain a decree in terms or an award under Sections 14 and 17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940. The plaintiffs and the defendants were partners carrying on several businesses and due to disputes, which arose between them, they referred the matter to arbitration by two arbitrators with a provision to have third arbitrator as an umpire. The award is dated 28-11-59. It was sent to the lower Court by the arbitrators by post on 25-1-61. When P. W. 1, one of the arbitrators, was in the witness box, this award was put to him. Then the 1st defendants counsel Mr. D. L. Chetty objected to the admissibility of the document; but the document was marked as Ex. A. 9, while at the same time in the deposition of P. W. I, it was noted by the court as follows:"mr. D. L. Chetty for 1st defendant objects to the admissibility -- As there is an issue No. 6 about the admissibility of the document, a finding on this will be given along with the finding on the other issues in the judgment. "

( 2 ) ISSUE No. 6 reads as follows:"whether the award is inad















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top