SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 48

A.GOPAL RAO, BASI REDDY
Desu Rayudu – Appellant
Versus
A. P. Public Service Commission, Hyderabad – Respondent


EKBOTE, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal and the writ petition involve a common question as to the interpretation of Art. 16 (4) and Art. 15 (4) of the Constitution of India. They can therefore be conveniently disposed of under one common judgment.

( 2 ) THE writ appeal is from the order of our learned brother, Gopalakrishnan Nair J. , given on 26-11-1964 by which he dismissed the writ petition in limine

( 3 ) THE writ petition 1475/64 is filed under Art. 226 of the Constitution for the issue of a writ of certiorari for bringing up the record relating to the Government of India communications Nos. 15/5/61-SCT-IV dated 14-8-1961 and F. 5-3-63-SCH-IV dated 5/4/1963 and to quash the same and to issue a direction to the respondent to continue the list of backward classes which was in vogue up to the year 1959-60.

( 4 ) THE material facts in regard to the writ appeal are that the two petitioner filed an application for the issue of a writ of Mandamus for declaring the notification issued by the Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission dated 29-10-1964 inviting applications for competitive examinations for direct recruitment to posts in Group I service as ultra virus, and to issue a consequentia


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top