SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 214

JAGMOHAN REDDY
R. Veerayya, M. Siddalingaiah – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


JAGMOHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE eight writ petitions raise a common question of law, namely, whether Rules 189 and 190 of the A. P. Motor Vehicles Rules, 1964 made under Section 64 read with Section 68 (2) (j) of the Motor Vehicles Act (4 of 1939) are ultra virus the powers of the Government and must therefore be struck down. Apart from this, in Writ Petition No. 749/65, there are certain other questions which require determination on the facts and merits of that particular case. It is therefore necessary to set out the facts in that writ petition.

( 2 ) THE petitioner therein is a transport operator in Chittoor District having 6 stage-carriage permits, to ply motor buses in Chittoor District. He has a well-equipped workshop and has been in the field as an operator of motor buses for 20 years. The Road Transport Authority called for applications for grant of a stage-carriage permit on the route Chittoor to Salem, which is a long distance route, by its notification No. 14992/a-1/62 pursuant to which 28 applications were filed, the petitioner being No. 16 of the applicants, and the 4th respondent is applicants Nos. 9 and 10. After notifying these applications under Sec. 57 (3) of the A

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top