SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 186

SHARFUDDIN AHMED
Mohd. Ali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Hakim Khaja Shafi Hasan – Respondent


SHARFUDDING AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THE only question used in this revision is that the rented deed relied on by the landlord in inadmissible in evidence for want of registration.

( 2 ) A suit was filed on the Small Cause side for recovery of arrears of rent at the rate of Rs. 24. 00 per month for the period extending from 13/02/1961 to 12/10/1961. The case of the respondent-landlord was that the rent for these months was recoverable from the petitioner his tenant at the rate of Rs. 24. 00 per month for the said period. The petitioner contended that he had received a sum of Rs. 1200. 00 from the respondent with interest at Rs. 2. 00 per cent per month and executed a sale deed as a collateral security for the said debt and also entered into an agreement of rent in lieu of interest. It was also pleaded that he had paid a sum of Rs. 1050. 00 in part payment of the amount advanced by the respondent and therefore he was not liable as claimed by the landlord. Further the argument was to the effect that the rental deed was inadmissible in evidence for want of registration.

( 3 ) THE lower Court considering these objections came to the conclusion that I view of the rental agreement, there was relat





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top