SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 172

VENKATESAM, JAGMOHAN REDDY
NALLA RAJA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


JAGANMOHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THESE 47 Writ Petitions challenge the validity of the Andhra Pradesh Land revenue [additional Assessment and Cess Revision) Act (XXII of 1962) and the andhra Pradesh. Land Revenue (Additional Assessment and Cess Revision (Amendment)Act (XXIIIof 1962) (hereinafter called "the Act" and "the amending act" respectively), both of which came into force from 1-7 1962. The grounds upon which they are challenged by the several advocates appearing in the respective writ Petitions, inter alia, are as follows: mr. Chowdary contends that under Sec. 4 (1) of the Act, land revenue on lands served by sources of irrigation specified in the schedule has been increased by 100% subject to a minimum of Rs. 20/ and maximum of Rs. 26/ per acre for single wet crop lands while the increase in the double wet crop lands is also 100% from a minimum of Rs. 30/- to a maximum of Rs. 39/--: and under Section 4 (2) of the Act, land revenue on lands served by Government sources other than those specified in the schedule has been increased by 100% for single wet crop lands form a minimum rate of Rs. 9/- to a maximum of Rs. 15/- per acre and for double wet crop lands 100% increase from a mi










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top