SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 219

JAGMOHAN REDDY
SRINADHU MALLAPPA – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE, State OF A. P. – Respondent


JAGMOHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ petition challenges the order of the Board of Revenue, reviewing its previous order granting patta to a ryotwari land under the proviso to Sec. 11 of the Estates (Abolition and Conversion in Ryotwari) Act, (26 of 1948) (herein-after called the "abolition Act" ). The petitioner and the 3rd Respondent were riral claimants for the grant of a ryotwari patta, before the Settlement Officer, who, after hearing both the parties and considering the rival claims, submitted A report to the Board of Revenue, in favour of grant of a patta to the petitioner. The board of Revenue confirmed this order on 4-6-1960, granting patta to the petitioner patta was accordingly issued to him and since then he is paying cist to the Government. Subsequently, the 3rd respondent applied for a review of that order, before the Board of Revenue on the ground that he was not heard.

( 2 ) HE also raised other contentions on merits, and prayed for a review of the order and to grant patta in his name. The Settlement Officer stated that the order granting patta cannot be reviewed, and that if at all, the 3rd respondent can file a revision before the Government. Notwithstanding this cle




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top