SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(AP) 250

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR
Pentala Kotiah - Appellant
Versus
State Public Prosecutor - Respondent
Decided On : 11-04-65

Retrenchment compensation payable under Section 25 (F) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is covered by Section 2 (vi) (d) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, and can be recovered under Section 15 (5) (b) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.

Headnote:

PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT - SECTION 2 (VI) (D) - RETRENCHMENT COMPENSATION - WHETHER COVERED - HELD, YES.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, Pentala Kotayya, challenged the proceeding in the Court of the learned VIth City Magistrate in Crl. M. P. No. 182 of 1965 on his file, where he was directed to deposit the sum of Rs. 1,125 as retrenchment compensation to his ex-employee, Bogavarapu Ammaya, under Section 15 (5) (b) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the retrenchment compensation awarded by the authority under Section 25 (F) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is an amount covered under Section 2 (vi) (d) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, and therefore, the learned Magistrate was competent to proceed under Section 15 (5) (b) for recovering the amount.

Issues: Whether the retrenchment compensation payable under Section 25 (F) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is covered by Section 2 (vi) (d) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the decision in B. N. Elias and Co. (Private Ltd. v. Authority Under Payment of Wages Act, AIR 1960 Cal 603, where it was held that the definition of 'wages' under Section 2 (vi) (d) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, is illustrative and not exhaustive, and that retrenchment compensation payable under Section 25 (F) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, comes within the definition of 'wages' as it is an implied term of the contract of employment.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the petition, holding that the learned Magistrate was competent to proceed under Section 15 (5) (b) of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936, for recovering the retrenchment compensation.

ANANTANARAYANA AYYAR, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, Pentala Kotayya, has filed this petition praying for quashing the proceeding in the Court of the learned VIth City Magistrate in Crl. M. P. No. 182 of 1965 on his file.

( 2 ) THE relevant facts are as follows: An authority duly empowered to act under the Payment of Wanes Act, passed an order on 26-10-1963 in file No. 2437/63 (Case No. 29/63) directing that the respondent, Pentala Kotayya, should pay an amount of Rs. 1,125 as retrenchment compensation to the petitioner, Bogavarapu Ammaya (an ex-employee of the petitioner herein) who was employed in a tobacco shop of which the petitioner, Pentala Kotayya was the owner. At the instance of the said authority, the learned VIth City Magistrate registered Crl. M. P. No. 182 of 1965 and issued a notice to the petitioner, Pentala Kotayya directing him to deposit the sum of Rs. 1,125 on or before 13-8-1965. Obviously, the learned Magistrate was proceeding under Section 15 (5) (b) of the Payment of Wages Act (Central Act IV of 1936 ). The Petitioner, Pentala Kotayya appeared by an advocate before the learned Magistrate and filed a petition contending that the amount sought to be recovered from him was not an amount which could be collected under Section 15 (5) (b) of the Act and that only wages could be collected by resort to that provision. On behalf of the petitioner, it was contended before the learned Magistrate that the matter involved a question of jurisdiction and that it should be decided either by the learned Magistrate himself or that a reference might be made to the High Court. The learned Magistrate issued a warrant on the same day for attachment of the movables in the residence of the said Pentala Kotayya. Thereupon the petitioner herein filed the present petition in this Court under Section 561-A, Cr. P. C.

( 3 ) THE correctness of the order passed by the authority dated 26-10-1963 is not challenged before me. No appeal was filed against that order as provided for in the Act. The only contention raised before me is that the amount concerned is not an amount which can he recovered under Section 15 (5) (b) of the Act. The order of the authority shows that the amount is awarded as retrenchment compensation. It is not contended before me that the amount is not due as retrenchment compensation. I proceed on the basis that the amount of retrenchment compensation has been awarded by the authority and can be lawfully collected from the petitioner.

( 4 ) SECTION 15 of the Act runs as follows: 1. The State Government may. . . . . . . . ap point any Commissioner for Workmens Compensation or other officer. . . . . . to be the authority to hear and decide for any specified area all claims arising out of. . . . delay in payment of the wages 2. Where contrary to the provisions of this Act, any payment of wages has been delayed such person. . . . may apply to such authority for a direction under Sub-section (3 ). (3) When any application under Sub-section (2) is entertained, the authority shall. . . . . and after such further inquiry (if any) as may be necessary, mat direct the payment of the delayed wages. 5. Any amount directed to be paid under this section may be recovered. . . . . . (b) if the authority is not a Magistrate by any Magistrate to whom the authority makes application in this behalf, as if it were a fine imposed by such Magistrate. "

( 5 ) SECTION 2 runs as follows:"in this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context. (vi) Wages means all remuneration. . . . . expressed in terms of money or capable of being so expressed which would, if the terms of employment, express or implied, were fulfilled, he payable to a person employed and includes. . . . . . . . (d) any sum which by reason of the termination of employment of the person employed is payable under any law, contract or instrument which provides for the payment of such sum but does not provide for the time within which the payment is to be made;"

( 6 ) S






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top