SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(AP) 16

Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : ANANTA NARAYANA AYYAR, P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Bansilal S.Patel - Appellant
Versus
State OF A.P. - Respondent
Decided On : 01-31-64

Government officials of the executive department cannot be considered to be independent persons for the purpose of S. 9 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

Headnote:

MINIMUM WAGES ACT - COMPOSITION OF COMMITTEES - INDEPENDENT PERSONS - INTERPRETATION - GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AS INDEPENDENT MEMBERS - VALIDITY OF G. O. NO. 1199 HOME (LABOUR II), DATED 30-6-1962 - CHALLENGED.

Fact of the Case:

Government passed G. O. No. 1199 (Home) Labour II dated 30-6-1962 revising the rates of wages for employment in tobacco including beedi making manufactories in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Petitioners challenged the validity of the G. O. contending that the committee appointed under S. 5 (1) (a) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 to hold an enquiry and advise the Government in respect of matters relating to revision of minimum wages in tobacco manufactories (including beedi making) was not properly constituted as the Chief Inspector of Factories and the Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories, who were officials of the executive side of the Government, cannot be said to be disinterested persons.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that Government officials of the executive department, as distinct from officials engaged in judicial work or department, cannot be considered to be independent persons for the purpose of S. 9 of the Act, even though they are not directly connected with the manufactory in which the wages are to be enquired and reported on by the Committee concerned. The Court also held that Government cannot be considered to be absolutely disinterested party in the matter of fixation of minimum wages.

Issues: Whether the committee appointed under S. 5 (1) (a) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 was properly constituted.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court relied on the decisions of the Madhya Pradesh and Calcutta High Courts in AIR 1961 Madh Pra 182 and 1961-2 Lab LJ 741 (Cal) respectively, which held that Government officials of the executive department cannot be considered to be independent persons for the purpose of S. 9 of the Act. The Court also agreed with the view of the Madhya Pradesh and Calcutta High Courts that Government cannot be considered to be absolutely disinterested party in the matter of fixation of minimum wages.

Final Decision: The Court allowed the writ petitions and quashed G. O. Ms. No. 1199 Home (Labour II), dated 30-6-1962.

ANANTHANARAYANA AYYAR , J.

( 1 ) THE relief asked for in each of these writ petitions is to call for the records in G. O. Ms. No. 1199 (Home) Labour II dated 30-6-1962 and to quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction in the nature of a Writ. W. P. No. 735 of 1962 was filed by Bansilal s. Patel, Proprietor of Kamala Beedi Works, Donekonda as sole petitioner against three respondents. Of them the first respondent is the State of Andhra Pradesh ; the second respondent is the Beedi Workers Karmika Sangham, Karimnagar represented by its General Secretary ; and the third respondent is the Beedi Mazdur Sangh, Nizamabad represented by its President. In W. P. No. 746 of 1962 the respondents are the same as in W. P. No. 735/ 1962. In each of the other writ petitions the State of Andhra Pradesh is the sole respondent. In W. P. No. 746 of 1962 there are 29 petitioners including various concerns engaged in the manufacture of beedies including M/s. Thakur, Savedekar and Co. , Private Ltd. , Nizamabad whose general manager filed the affidavit on behalf of all those petitioners. In W. P. No. 807 of 1962, there are eight petitioners who are all beedi factories at Warangal, each petitioner being represented by proprietor or manager. In W. P. No. 337 of 1963, the petitioner is Narayana Velpur Beedi Manufacturing Factory, Velpur represented by its proprietor.

( 2 ) ALL the writ petitions are contested by the State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Government Pleader. Shri P. Ramachandra Reddy, and they were heard together by common consent.

( 3 ) THE relevant facts are as follows. On 11-2-1961, Government passed G. O. No. 319 (Home) Labour II dated 11-2-1961 revising the rates of wages for employment in tobacco including beedi making manufactories in the State of Andhra Pradesh and fixing uniform rates for the whole State. Subsequently, on 20-5-1961, the Government passed G. O. No. 969 (Home) Labour II substituting a new schedule in place of the schedule which has been given in the earlier notification relating to G. O. No. 319. By this new G. O. No. 969, the Government purported to make an amendment to the earlier G. O. The Government made a differentiation between Andhra area and Telangana area and also fixed a flat rate of wages for all sizes of beedies in the Telangana area which was equal to the rate for the big size zadi beedies which had been given for the whole State in G. O. No. 319. The petitioner in W. P. No. 735 of 1962 filed W. P. No. 714 of 1961 in this Court challenging the validity of G. O. Nos. 319 and 969. Many others filed thirty nine other similar writ petitions ; the batch of forty writ petitions were pending at the time when W. P. No. 735 of 1962 was presented on 30-7-1962 and when W. P. No. 746 of 1962 was presented on 30-7-1962 and when W. P. No. 746 of 1962 was presented on 2-8-1962. On 20-8-1962, the batch of forty writs including W. P. No. 714 of 1961 was dismissed. (3a) Meanwhile, on 27-2-1962 Government passed G. O. No. 362, Home Department (Labour II) appointing a committee consisting of six members under S. 5 (1) (a) of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 to hold an enquiry and advise the Government in respect of matters relating to revision of minimum wages in tobacco manufactories (including beedi making ). The six members of the Committee were as follows : (1) Chief Inspector of Factories, Hyderabad, Chairman (2) C. J. Reddy, Deputy Chief Inspector of Factories, Hyderabad (3) Shri Lakshmi Narayana Rudra,

( 4 ) SHRI Ghulam Ahmed Tara Saheb, Poona,

( 5 ) SRI K. Anantha Reddy, President of Nizamabad Beedi Mazdoor Sangh ; this Sangh is the third respondent in W. P. No. 735 of 1962 and W. P. No. 746/ 62, (6) C. Prabhakar, General Secretary, Beedi Karmika Sangham Karimnagar ; this Sangham is the second respondent in W. P. No. 735 of 1962 and W. P. No. 746/ 62. The G. O. fixed the term of office of these members as one month i. e. , till 26-3-1962. Of these, No. 4 Tara Sah










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top