SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(AP) 42

N.KUMARAYYA, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Commissioner of Gift-tax, A. P. at Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
C. Satyanarayana Murthi – Respondent


P. CHANDRA REDDY, C. J, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference involves the proper interpretation of clauses (xii) and (xxiv) of Section 2 read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Gift Tax Act, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as the Act ). The question we are required to answer in this reference is formulated in these words :"whether/ the declaration by which Sri C. Malakondiah has impressed the character of a joint Hindu family property on the self-acquired properties owned by him amounts to a transfer so as to attract the provisions of the Gift-tax Act. "

( 2 ) THE fact giving rise to this reference lie in a short compass and may be stated as follows : - One Sri C. Malakondiah, who was the manager of joint Hindu family consisting of himself and his five sons, thought of throwing his self-acquisitions into common stock. This result he wanted to achieve by a declaration executed on the 1/05/1957. It reads as follows :"having intended and resolved to convert all the properties owned by me into joint family properties of myself and my five undivided sons, I hereby give effect to my intention and resolution by declaring that from now all my properties will be joint family properties of myself and my wife undiv






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top