CHANDRA REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters Patent Appeal is filed against the judgment of Justice Seshachalapati in S. A. No. 575 of 1959 with the learned Judges leave.

( 2 ) THE facts giving rise to this appeal may be shortly stated. The appellants father borrowed a sum of Rs. 950 on the 25/09/1950 and executed a promissory note for that sum on the same date. Sometime later a suit was instituted on behalf of the appellant that his father was leading an immoral life and was wasting away the family properties. This suit was not opposed by the father (he remaining ex parte), with the result that a preliminary decree was passed on the 28th of August 1953. On the same date, the father executed a promissory note in renewal of the debt for Rs. 1,117-1-10 and made an endorsement on the back of the promissory note which amounted to an acknowledgment of the debt. The final decree in the partition suit was passed on the 25th of August 1955. Meanwhile the respondent filed a suit for the recovery of the amount under the promissory notes impleading the father as well as the son as defendants to the suit. In this suit, the present appellant being minor at that time, was represented by the father. T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document