Andhra Pradesh High Court
Judges : BASI REDDI, NARASIMHAM
Public Prosecutor - Appellant
Versus
Yellagadda Ramakrishna Rao - Respondent
Decided On : 08-21-64
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT - TRANSPORT VEHICLE - DEFINITION - TRACTOR WITH TRAILER ATTACHED - WHETHER A TRANSPORT VEHICLE - MOTOR VEHICLES TAXATION ACT - EXEMPTION - SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF AGRICULTURE - MEANING.
Fact of the Case:
The respondents were acquitted of offences under Sections 123 and 125 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, and Section 7 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1931. The prosecution alleged that the respondents were using a tractor with a trailer attached to carry bricks, which was not a transport vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, and that they had not paid tax for the quarter. The respondents claimed that the vehicles were exempt from tax under Section 11-A of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, which exempts vehicles used solely for the purposes of agriculture.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that a tractor with a trailer attached is a transport vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act, and that the respondents were therefore liable to pay tax for the quarter. The court also held that the respondents were not using the vehicles solely for the purposes of agriculture, and were therefore not exempt from tax under Section 11-A of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act.
Issues: 1. Whether a tractor with a trailer attached is a transport vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act? 2. Whether the respondents were using the vehicles solely for the purposes of agriculture, and were therefore exempt from tax under Section 11-A of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that a tractor with a trailer attached is a transport vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act because it is a mechanically propelled vehicle adapted for use upon roads, and is not a vehicle running upon fixed rails or a vehicle of a special type adapted for use only in a factory or in any other enclosed premises. 2. The court held that the respondents were not using the vehicles solely for the purposes of agriculture because they were using them to carry bricks, which is not an agricultural purpose.
Final Decision: The court set aside the acquittals and convicted the respondents of offences under Sections 123 and 125 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and Section 7 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act. The respondents were sentenced to fines.
( 2 ) THE following are the relevant facts : On 29-4-1962 the Motor Vehicles Inspector, Kakinada, checked a tractor and trailor combination bearing Registration Nos. A. P. P. 3795 respectively at Kadiam. The vehicles were carrying bricks, a building material. The owner of these vehicles is the 1st respondent. At the time of the checking, the 2nd respondent was driving the tractor. The driver did not produce the registration certificate, the insurance certificate, the driving licence, the permit and the fitness certificates. The tax for the quarter ending 30-6-1962 was not paid. No tax disc was exhibited. The Officer seized the vehicles and handed them to the Police at Dowleswaram. The respondents were prosecuted for offences under the Motor Vehicles Act and the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act.
( 3 ) THE Judicial Second Class Magistrate acquitted the respondents of the offences as above stated in the view that a tractor was not a transport vehicle within the meaning of Section 2 (33) of the Motor Vehicles Act. that Section 38 of the said Act had therefore no application and there was therefore no liability to produce the fitness certificates and the certificate of insurance and further that an offence under Section 7 of the Motor Vehicles Taxation Act was not committed as there was no proof that the vehicles were used for non-agricultural purposes throughout the quarter. The learned Magistrate purported to follow the decision of Sanjeevarow Naidu, J. in In Re. Rayala Rama Rao, 1960 ALT 171 : (AIR 1961 Andh Pra 66) in finding as above.
( 4 ) THE appeal came on for hearing before Mirza. J. The learned Judge felt that a Bench might go into this question and that is how the case is before us.
( 5 ) THERE is no controversy over the facts that on the day when the Motor Vehicles Inspector checked the vehicles, the relevant certificates were not produced and that tax had not been paid for that quarter.
( 6 ) THE learned Public Prosecutor has urged before us that it is incorrect to say that a tractor with a trailer attached is not a transport vehicle within the meaning of the Motor Vehicles Act and that it is equally incorrect to say that the vehicles fall within the purview of Section 11-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1. and are therefore exempt from tax.
( 7 ) THE first point which arises for our considerations is whether the tractor with a trailer attached are transport vehicles within the meaning of Section 2 (33) of the Motor Vehicles Act. We would first peruse the relevant definitions in the Act.
( 8 ) SECTION 2 Clause (33) defines "transport vehicle" as meaning "a public service vehicle or a good vehicle". A public service vehicle is defined in Section 2 (25) thus : "public service vehicle" means any motor vehicle used or adapted to be used for the carriage of passengers for hire or reward and include a motor cab, contractor carriage, and stage carriage. " A good vehicle is defined in Section 2 (8) as meaning"any motor vehicle constructed or adapted for use for the carriage of goods, or any motor vehicle not so constructed or adapted when used for the carriage of goods solely or in addition to passengers. " Section 2 (18) defines a "motor vehicle" thus : "motor Vehicle" means any mechanically propelled vehicle adapted for use upon roads whether the power of propulsion is transmitted thereto from an external or internal source and includes a chasis to which a body has not been attached and a trailer, but does not include a vehicle running upon fixed rails or a vehicle of a special type adapted for use only in a factory or in any other enclosed premises. "
( 9 ) IT is therefore to be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.