SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(AP) 42

GOPALA KRISHNAN NAIR, P.CHANDRA REDDY
Bheema Reddi Jeedikanti Ram Reddi – Appellant
Versus
Salla Venkat Reddy – Respondent


REDDY, C. J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal presented against the judgment of our learned brother, Srinivasachari J. , under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, the short point for determination is whether Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act could be invoked by a usufructuary mortgagee.

( 2 ) THE suit brought by the respondent on the foot of a registered sale deed for possession of the property, which was usufructuarily mortgaged to the appellant under an unregistered document, was resisted by the appellant on the basis of his possession obtained in part performance of the mortgage.

( 3 ) WHILE the trial court decreed the suit overruling the defence, the lower appellate court on appeal by the aggrieved defendant dismissed the suit upholding the plea of the defendant. In second appeal brought by the plaintiff against the judgment of the District Judge our learned brother, Srinivasachari J. , reversed the lower appellate Courts judgment in the view that Section 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act is inapplicable to the case of a usufructuary mortgage. It is this view of the learned Judge that is challenged before us by the defendant.

( 4 ) SECTION 53-A of the Transfer of property Act re








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top