SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(AP) 67

NARASIMHAM, P.SATYANARAYANA RAJU
Indian Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works, Hyderabad represented by its – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad – Respondent


NARASIMHAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application for the issue of an appropriate writ against the State of Andhra Pradesh to forbear from enforcing the Notification, G. O. Ms. No. 1376, Revenue dated 5/09/1962, issued under the Hyderabad Intoxicating Drugs Act (Act IV of 1333 F.) (hereinafter referred as the Intoxicating Drugs Act), of rules for the manufacture, possession, sale import, export and transport of Chloral Hydrate, a drug within the meaning of the Drugs Act of 1940. One of the rules provided inter alia that the manufacture of the said drug shall be under a licence granted by the Excise Commissioner on payment of Excise duty of Rs. 500. 00 per annum. It would not be necessary to refer to the other specific rules.

( 2 ) THE petitioners, three in number, Messrs. Indian Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works, Hyderabad, Messrs. Pankaj Chemical and Pharmaceutical Works, Hyderabad and Messrs. Commercial Chemical Co. , Sanathnagar, Hyderabad, are the manufacturers of the said drug under the licences issued under the Drug Rules framed under the Drugs Act of 1940. They challenge the notification of the respondent Government as ultra vires the powers of the Government on the ground that th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top