( 1 ) THIS appeal raises an interesting question of limitation. The appellant is a creditor, while the respondent is a jagirdar-debtor. It is the case of the appellant that the respondent has been borrowing moneys from him on bonds and promissory notes. She borrowed a sum of Rs. 18,000. 00 on the 12th Meher 1356 F. at 9% per annum, repayment being on monthly instalments of Rs. 300. 00 with a condition that default of any instalment would entitle the creditor to recover the balance of the amount. Apart from this debt, there are four others Rs. 3,200. 00 borrowed on a document dated the 4th Thir, 1357 F. at 12% per annum; Rs. 500. 00 under a document dated 10th Meher 1357 F. at 12% per annum; Rs. 600. 00by a document dated the 15th Bahman 1358 F. and Rs. 8,000. 00 under a document of 10th Ardibehist, 1353 F. at 6% per annum. Except for the first debt of Rs. 18,000. 00 obtained under a band dated the 12th Meher, 1355 F. , all the other debts have been held by the Board to be time-barred. In respect of the first debt, it has been held that Rs. 9,000. 00 were paid and the balance of the amount together with interest is due. The appellant complained that the Jagirdar Debt Settlement Boar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document