GOPAL KRISHNAN NAIR, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals arise out of O. S. Nos 52 of 1955 and 45 of 1956 on the file of the Subordinate Judge s Court, Bapatla. The appellant was the plaintiitin both the suits. The first suit was for recevery oi the value of 39 tolas of gold which was alleged to be the mahar due to the plaintiff from her husband, who divorced her on 7th June, 1955, and also for recovery of jewels worth Rs. 5,000 and a wrist watch worth Rs, 600. The parties are Muslims the plaintiff, Who was about 18 years old, was married to the defendant-res- pondent on 4th May, 1955 at Bapatla whets her sister resided with her husband (P. W. 3 ). The day after the marriage, the defendant-respondent took the plaintiff to Pondicherry. On his way, he stopped at Hyderabad for about three days. After reaching Pondicherry, the husband and wife lived there for about two weeks. On 27th May, 1955, the plaintiff s sister and her husband (P. W. 3) went to Pondicherry with the object of taking the plaintiff back to Bapatla for making the customary visits after the marriage. The evidence in the case shows that the unannounced arrival of P. W. 3 and his wife (plaintiff s sister) at Pondicherry annoyed t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document